ffutures: (Tooth and Claw)
[personal profile] ffutures
I need someone to check a little maths for me.

First read this passage from Jo Walton's web site, describing Dragon units of time:

http://www.zorinth.net/bluejo/books/dragon/dates.htm

Assuming that the dragon foot is the same as our own, and that gravity is the same – both open to question – it’s possible to convert the figures on that page to determine the length of the day and year compared to our world.

If I've done my maths right, the dragon second is 1.864 human seconds, the time it takes a drop of water to fall 30ft. from rest at 1g. The other Dragon time units convert as follows:
1 dragon minute = 80 dragon seconds
= 149.1 earth seconds
1 dragon hour = 80 dragon minutes
= 198.83 earth minutes
1 dragon day = 20 dragon hours
= 66.27 earth hours
= 2.76 earth days
1 dragon year = 200 dragon days
= 1.51 earth years

Okay... if I've got all that right, and assuming that this world has a climate similar to our own, it must be in a wider orbit than the Earth. Can anyone give me figures for the orbital radius, and if possible a ballpark estimate of what type of star it would need to be?

Date: 2007-09-17 07:26 pm (UTC)
ext_20894: (Science Geeks)
From: [identity profile] very-true-thing.livejournal.com
Back of the envelope...

Depends on the type of star. If the star is the same as ours then the orbit will be 1.31AU.

(See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_period)

However, the much longer day is likely to rule out the same climate as there will be, for starters, more opportunity for night time cooling and thus greater differences between day and night time temperatures leading to all sorts effects.

Date: 2007-09-17 07:31 pm (UTC)
ext_20894: (Default)
From: [identity profile] very-true-thing.livejournal.com
Meant to add, for our sun 1.31AU is inside the habitable zone but getiing towards the cold side (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitable_zone)

Date: 2007-09-17 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Yes, the long day is a bit of a bugger. I have a feeling that there was a small mathematical error, and that the Dragon second was meant to be a lot closer to our second than it is.

Date: 2007-09-17 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armb.livejournal.com
Ask Jo to say "One rainbow in Irieth" in dragonish, time her, and work out the length of a dragon foot from that (assuming gravity is the same).
Then assume both seconds and and feet are the same and work out gravity from that.
Now pick the answer you like the look of.

Date: 2007-09-17 07:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
It seems to work out as a slightly warmer world with a G0 star, assuming I haven't screwed up the maths, and about the same as us, apart from the day-night extremes, with G1. Does that sound about right?

Date: 2007-09-17 07:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Because I don't understand it very well?

Date: 2007-09-17 08:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pompe.livejournal.com
An F7V star with about 1.9 times solar luminosity and the planet at 1.4 AU would work, but this star would then be considerably younger than our Sun, maybe 3 billion years or so.

However, another solution is to simply assume the dragonworld's sun is a sun-like G2-star but older, because then of course it would be brighter. But then it probably is so old it is moving off the main sequence into a subgiant, G2IV-V, and then the planet would be almost 10 billion years old.

You can use a middle way, say an F9V star older than the Sun but just an extra billion years or so, if my math works out.

Date: 2007-09-17 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Thanks - the F9 sounds good to me. I was thinking G0 but that's actually too cool.

Date: 2007-09-17 10:27 pm (UTC)
ext_15169: Self-portrait (Default)
From: [identity profile] speakr2customrs.livejournal.com
Why does it take a drop of water so much longer to fall 30 ft than it would take, say, a chunk of cheese or a hollow iron ball filled with feathers? Air resistance?

Date: 2007-09-17 11:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
None of the above. Anything falling 30ft from rest at 1g takes a bit under 2 seconds to reach its destination.

g is 981cm sec squared, so after a second the object is travelling at 981cm per second.
To reach that speeed it has to start from zero and accelerate, so the average speed in the first second is
981 - 0 / 2, only 490.5 cm/sec
After two seconds the average speed is 981cm cm/sec, and by then it has travelled more than 30ft, so the the correct time for a 30ft fall is a bit less than 2 seconds.

Date: 2007-09-17 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Sorry, that "anything" ignores air resistance.

Date: 2007-09-18 11:06 am (UTC)
ext_15169: Self-portrait (Default)
From: [identity profile] speakr2customrs.livejournal.com
Maybe the world creator made the same mistake that I made, or rather that my old teachers did; I was taught that g = 32 feet per second per second, and that this meant that a falling object fell 32 feet in the first second, a further 64 in the second second, and 96 more feet in the third. Not quite the same thing.

Date: 2007-09-18 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
It's an easy mistake to make - I had to look at it twice before I realised why it didn't work out.

Date: 2007-09-18 04:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] captboulanger.livejournal.com
I haven't done the exact calculations (my math and physics I know are rustier than yours) but I suspect the conditions would be closer to our-world (timewise) if you tweek up the gravity by, say, 15%. (to 1.15 g) This wouldn't have a direct affect on the rest of the calculations except that your measurement of time is dervied from a gravitational behavior which would then go faster, hence shorter periods of time.

Date: 2007-09-18 05:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
That's true, but it still leaves the day very long. I'm waiting to hear back from Jo on whether it was deliberate or a maths error.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 56 7 8910
11 12 13 14151617
18 19 20 21222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 07:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »