ffutures: (marcus 2013)
[personal profile] ffutures
Prompted by this post by [livejournal.com profile] gonzo21

The huge fuss about HS2 ignores something important. Realistically, what's needed isn't a high-speed railway but a high-capacity railway. Lots of normal trains with enough room for everyone to sit down would be much more useful than a small number of really fast ones, and could be packed closer together because they would be able to stop a lot faster. I really can't think of any politician who has mentioned this.

Date: 2013-09-11 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vicarage.livejournal.com
Transport Secretary Mr McLoughlin told the Sunday Times: "I think possibly the selling of the project was done wrong.

"The speed makes a difference to Manchester and Leeds, where you get an hour off the journey, but 20 minutes off the journey to Birmingham is almost irrelevant.

"It is nice but it is not important. It should always have been about capacity."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24009212

Date: 2013-09-11 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Glad someone got it right.

Date: 2013-09-12 09:07 am (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
The problem with high capacity trains is that you need high capacity platforms -- to get passengers on and off them -- at every station stop. And you lose flexibility: a single 1000-seat train every hour is probably less useful than a 500-seat train every half hour.

High speed running means you can in principle put more capacity on the line. In practice, braking distance increases non-linearly so you need to leave bigger gaps. Also, power consumption goes up non-linearly.

The real answer is actually more railway lines -- not just one HS2 line, but 2-3 regular speed lines. But listen to the NIMBY chorus if you propose to build new railways! (As they take up about as much land area as a motorway when you allow for trackside clearances ...)

Date: 2013-09-12 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
By high capacity I meant more of the normal trains, not bigger trains, but I see your point. I would have thought that with modern technology the gaps between trains could be shorter, but I suppose there has to be a big safety margin.

Date: 2013-09-12 09:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
Isn't another problem with high speed rail that the UK isn't really that big, so there aren't many long stretches of track without any stops in which a high speed train could really get up to top speed anyway?

It seems increasingly like a vanity project to me. Either that or the contractors have dropped a massive wadge of cash into the back pockets of a few key ministers.

Date: 2013-09-12 10:52 am (UTC)
ext_52412: (Default)
From: [identity profile] feorag.livejournal.com
I think there's a strong case for a high-speed East Coast Main Line. At the moment, it takes 4.5 hours to get between Edinburgh and London yet the equivalent distance in Japan (Tokyo-Osaka) takes 2.5 hours.

The line itself is mostly straight, but the problem is that it shares it with other traffic (Shinkansen get dedicated lines). Japan is also quite similar to the UK in terms of there being not much room in which to put a straight line, so recent developments in high-speed trains there have focussed on being able to go faster around bends rather than the ultimate top speed.

Date: 2013-09-12 10:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
My recollection of the last time I travelled a long way on the train was that the travelling part itself didn't take too long, it was all of the stops along the way.

I wonder what sort of earthquake prevention the Japanese high speed rail system has in place. Presumably they'll have something?

Date: 2013-09-12 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
My guess would be a lot of seismographs along the line, an emergency shutdown system, and some very competent track repair teams.

Date: 2013-09-12 02:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
What we need, of course, is a monorail above the existing lines and sharing their right of way...

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23 4567
8 910 11121314
15 1617 18192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 10:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »